Monday, August 9, 2010

Grannypants





According to the Sun and New York Magazine, with all the madness around Mad Men and the 60s these days, thong sales are down because women are now into high-waisted pants. A couple things here. I watch a lot of Mad Men, OK? And I don't exactly remember chicks wearing those high-waisted pants. There seem to be a whole lot of dresses going on. An image search on Betty Draper looking for pants looks has been fruitless.

But in any case, I seriously doubt that the same girls who were buying thongs so that people could see them when their waistband rode below their asscracks are now wearing LBJ-years-inspired high-waisted pants. Or, oh! Am I screwing up the British word for pants? I guess they mean underpants...

Alright then, it seems that now UNDERPANTs are elephant style now, and cover the bellybutton. Who would've thought. Maybe the History Channel will make a show about heretic burning in the 15th century and chastity belts will come back in vogue.


Sunday, April 25, 2010

"10 tragic moments in pants"

Salon.com just had a feature in Broadsheet, "10 tragic moments in pants", a venomous attack on any sort of non-normative cut of pants. Very unscientific. More later...

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Eldridge Cleaver's Penis Pants



The black activist and author behind Soul on Ice put the royalties towards developing Eldridge Cleaver Ltd., which aspired to create pants more sympathetic to the male form:

"We've been castrated in clothing, and my pants open up new vistas. I'm against penis binding. Mean wear their penis either down the right pants leg or the left. Now, if you cut away a piece of the material on wither side you'll see that the penis is strapped to the leg. Pants were orignially designed to corral the penis." Eldridge Cleaver, from Jet Magazine, 1978.

Via Dangerous Minds

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Things Fall Apart



The Suddeutsche Zeitung reports on the comeback of the jogging pant to the runway in a little photo essay (in German) called "Sacks that Call Themselves Pants" which chronicles Alexander Wang's (see above) de-hag of the baggy bags. This falls, I suppose, firmly within the postmodern camp, in that the low sign signifies the high or whatever. I suppose it would earn the designation of post-post modern if the banality of it's high-low mixup elicited no comment at all?

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Friday, July 10, 2009

history of pantyhose

though not pants per se, a bipedal phenomenon nontheless, check out here a history of pantyhose

Sunday, June 22, 2008

a terribly relevant commentary on pants by fashion/cultural observer genius bill cunningham